Jihad and Revolution: The Convergence of Islam and Communism in Global Politics..

The shared struggle of communism and Islam against Jews over the past 80 years is precisely the common element that Stalin and Hitler lacked to avoid destroying each other

jihad

Marxism reveals its latent theological dimensions most clearly through Islam, whose archetypal foundations are inherently universal (Catholic in scope) and aligned with a religion that seeks total dominion from a position of initial weakness. Thus, Marxism attains its fullest expression as a political-revolutionary doctrine only within the framework of Islam.

Meanwhile, Islam discovers its ability to penetrate the West only through Marx, as it lacks the cunning rationality of German Hegelianism. When Jews and the West are the common enemy, and Bolshevism has long since become Muslim rather than Jewish, the task becomes easier than ever.

Article

Jihad, like revolution, is part of a continuous struggle. This struggle is particularly significant for those who have embraced it, people whose actions and lack of recognition that all humans are created in the image of God reflect a godless disposition.

Historically, this represents one of the final stages of the war against the spiritual forms of classical liberal Enlightenment, which began to develop from the synthesis of the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation, reaching its peak in 17th-century England.

The counter-movement of the Enlightenment began in 18th-century German philosophy and has since found allies among the world’s failures, primarily from the Global South and the East, and in the last century, among nihilistic groups in the West.

It can be said that the only difference between the first combined attack of German philosophy against God and man, namely, communism and Nazism, is that this time, Islam has replaced Nazism.

Islam has learned from Hitler’s mistake and chosen to collaborate with communism rather than attack it.

If in the past, the communist struggle was against the capitalist bourgeoisie, and the Nazi struggle was against the Jewish-Bolshevik dominance in the East and the Jewish-bourgeois dominance in the West, limiting Nazi-communist cooperation to mutual political suspicion and hatred of the West, this time, the enemy is far more concrete, and the objectives are far more shared.

This may explain why Islam and communism refrain from attacking one another. Their common enemy is the West and Jews together. Now that this enemy has been concentrated in one clear territory (Israel) and their influence diminished (the collapse of the white man), it is possible not only to share an enemy but also to divide spheres of influence. Thus, the division of Poland becomes the division of Europe and the Middle East in a joint struggle against the West and Israel.

With the transformation of racial theory into a post-colonial tactic designed to advance jihad and revolution, and with the recognition that militaristic racism is a regressive step, jihad and revolution measure each other’s success by their ability to suppress political Judaism (Zionism) and destroy classical liberalism in the West.

These are shared goals par excellence, ones that Stalin and Hitler could not have dreamed of. The historically hostile relations of the Soviet Union and Islam toward Zionism and the West clearly paved the way for this movement.

It must be understood that for Islam, communism is a default ally. If only they could have collaborated with Hitler! But once it became clear to the Soviet Union that more power and oil (a mistake!) could be gained from the Arabs, they embraced the Muslims. Similarly, once the Muslims ran out of Nazis and fascists, they embraced the communists. Young people simply call it “struggle” and “revolution.”

It should be remembered that communism did not seek to attack Hitler; it was Hitler who believed communism was a Jewish conspiracy that needed to be attacked. Muslims, however, do not see communism as the central conspiracy but rather Zionism and America. Thus, they have no issue turning communists into useful idiots and collaborating with them, especially since communists already view Jews as inherently bourgeois. Just as they did not seek to attack Nazism before it declared war on the USSR, communism now clearly does not seek to attack Islam but arrogantly seeks to absorb it. However, Islam will ultimately dominate, as Yoav Netzer demonstrates, since Islam is the inevitable endpoint of any feudal-vassal system, making the communist the liberal facade of Islam.

The fact that Muslim-Nazi barbarism works so well with communist universalism is primarily demonstrated in their joint struggle against Judaism as a philosphy. Judaism combines moral and cultural traits that oppose Nazi-like Islamism and economic morality that opposes communist oppression. The shared struggle of communism and Islam against Jews over the past 80 years is precisely the common element that Stalin and Hitler lacked to avoid destroying each other.

Now, one might wait for Muslims to think like Hitler, believing not only that America is controlled by Jews but also that the communists themselves are. However, at the rate at which Islam in the West is swallowing communism, it can be said that Islamo-communism has inherited what Hitler imagined as Judeo-Bolshevism - so there is no need to worry about this.

Islam realized that Nazism came too early. Nazism represents a phase of consolidation and powerת one that did not suit Islam at the time, which was still inferior and weak.

While Nazism may have offered temporary relief from British and French pressure, it could not lead to an Islamic world order for three main reasons:

• Power remained in the hands of the European.
• Islam's status remained subordinate, unable to challenge white territories.
• Nazism, as a nationalist ideology, was closed to foreign influence.

All three of these factors are immediately nullified in Communism. Therefore, despite the deep “spiritual” affinities between Nazism and Islam (possibly even stronger than between Nazism and Marxism, or Marxism and Islam), from a long-term strategic perspective, Marxism and Communism serve Islamic objectives far more effectively.